Skip to main content

Fuels: Landscape Acquisition Critique and Editing

  1. Primary Reference
  2. LCP Data Sources
  3. Other Data Sources
  4. LCP Fuel Themes
  5. Nomenclature for Spatial Data Layers
  6. LCP Critique
  7. Editing and Updating the Landscape (LCP) File

Primary Reference

Guidebook on LANDFIRE fuels data acquisition, critique, modification, maintenance, and model calibration at https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/31921 Stratton, Richard D. 2009. RMRS-GTR-220. Fort Collins, CO, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 54 p. 

Return to Top

LCP Data Sources

LANDFIRE Data Distribution Site

There are several versions of LANDFIRE data, including LCP files (2001, 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014). You can evaluate what is available in each version with its Version Comparison Table.  There is no online tool for editing the files before download. Downloaded files may be requested in either the US Albers or the local UTM projection.

Wildland Fire Decision Support System (WFDSS)

Analysis tools in WFDSS (Basic, STFB, NTFB, and FSPro) include downloadable LCP files.  Users may edit the LCP files before download.  Downloaded files come with a custom Albers projection that may require some reprojection effort before combining with shapefiles in FARSITE and FLAMMAP analysis. LCP Critique reports are available alongside the LCP file.

Interagency Fuel Treatment Decision Support System (IFTDSS)

IFTDSS uses spatial analysis tools in support of Hazard Analysis, Prescribed Burn Planning, Risk Assessment, Fuels Treatment, and Fire Effects planning.  Primarily based on the FLAMMAP processor, analysis tools use LANDFIRE data, allowing the user to edit and download LCPs from their projects.

Return to Top

Other Data Sources

Wildland Fire/Treatment History

  • Burn severity layers
  • Fire progression layers
  • Fuel treatments
  • Prescribed fire perimeters
  • Wildfire perimeters

Ecological Considerations

  • Areas of critical environmental concern
  • Sensitive or critical wildlife habitat
  • Threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) flora and fauna habitat
  • Rivers and streams
  • Water bodies
  • Vegetation or cover-type classification

Socio-Economic Considerations

  • Ownership and jurisdiction layer
  • Historical and recreational sites
  • Primary and secondary residences
  • Remote automated weather stations (RAWS)
  • Roads and Trails
  • Urban development

Other Base Layers

  • Aerial photos
  • Digital orthophoto quad (DOQ) or quarter quad (DOQQ)
  • Digital raster graph (DRG)

Return to Top

LCP Fuel Themes

Surface Fuel Model

13 original Fuel Models

Anderson, H. E. 1982. Aids to determining fuelmodels for estimating fire behavior. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-122. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 22 p. 

40 Standard Fuel Models

Scott, Joe H.;Burgan, Robert E. 2005. Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-153. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,Rocky Mountain Research Station.72 p.

The following themes all relate to a forest canopy that affects mid-flame wind speed, spotting, and crown fire potential.

Scott, Joe H.; Reinhardt, Elizabeth D. 2005. Stereo photo guide for estimating canopy fuel characteristics in conifer stands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-145. Fort Collins, CO: U.S.Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 49p.

Canopy Cover (CC)

In percent, 0-100%, practical Maximum is 70% in most conifer fuel types.

Canopy Height (CH or SH)

Units in Meters*10, divide by 10 to get actual height in meters.

Canopy Base Height (CBH)

Units in Meters*10, divide by 10 to get actual height in meters.

Canopy Bulk Density

Units in Kilograms/meter3*100, divide by 100 to get actual density.

Return to Top

Nomenclature for Spatial Data Layers

Fuel Type Fuel Model Bloc Pre-Defined Reserved for Future
Pre-defined Models		 Available for
Custom Fuel Models
FB 01-13 01-13 N/A N/A
Custom 14-89 N/A N/A 14-89
NB 90-99 91-93, 98-99 94, 95 90, 96, 97
GR 100-119 101-109 110-112 100, 113-119
GS 120-139 121-124 125-130 120, 131-139
SH 140-159 141-149 150-152 140, 153-159
TU 160-179 161-165 166-170 160, 171-179
TL 180-199 181-189 190-192 180, 193-199
SB 200-219 201-204 205-210 200, 211-219
Custom 220-256 N/A N/A 220-256

Return to Top

LCP Critique

The LCP Critique report is an essential element in the calibration process. It can be obtained from the same WFDSS analysis landscape tab that the LCP was obtained from. Or, if the LCP is downloaded, it can be loaded in FLAMMAP and a critique can be generated from there.  There is a stand-alone version LCPCritique at https://www.frames.gov/catalog/11606.

On the first page

  • View the filename, latitude, cell resolution, and coordinate system in the header information to insure the file used is correct.
  • View the Theme units, ranges, and value distributions to make sure that the lcp is valid and that there is no corrupted data.
  • Determine the important surface fuel models in the LCP.

As an example, this histogram shows that fuel models 183, 165, 102, and 122 are the primary surface fuels.

Image
Fuels distribution display in LCP Critique report showing a bar graph of the fuel model classification.

Is that what you expect? What are the critical inputs for each of these fuel models? Are any of them dynamic?

Image and Legend Pages for Each Theme

Some data problems can be identified visually here, such as vertical and horizontal lines in slope themes. The fuel model image can be reviewed by comparing mapped fuel models with areas that have had ground verification or high confidence classifications.

Theme Distributions for each Surface Fuel Models, in order of importance

  • Evaluate the terrain theme ranges and distributions for elevation, slope, and aspect. Are these appropriate for the fuel model? How would you revise or adjust them? Consider whether the fuel model needs to be changed for certain terrain value combinations.
  • Canopy characteristics should be evaluated carefully to ensure that canopy cover (wind adjustment, fuel shading), tree heights (wind adjustment, spotting distance), and canopy base height (crown fire initiation), distributions make sense for the specific fuel model.
  • Canopy bulk density (active crown fire propagation) values are not only related to the fuel model and canopy tree species, they also must be appropriately scaled for the crown fire propagation model used (surface fire control - Finney vs. crown fire control - Scott & Reinhardt; see Crown Fire Initiation and Propagation Section.

Return to Top

Editing and Updating the Landscape (LCP) File

Any errors or necessary adjustments identified here should be included in landscape edits performed before the first analyses are conducted.

There are several tools for editing LCP files:

Print PDF

NWCG Latest Announcements

2024 Week of Remembrance

Date: June 27, 2024
Contact: 6 Minutes for Safety Subcommittee 

As we approach the 2024 Week of Remembrance (WOR), June 30 to July 6, we dedicate this time to thoughtfully reviewing and recognizing the events of the 2018 Mendocino Complex. As such, this year’s theme of “Learning From the Mendocino Complex” embodies a longstanding hallmark of WOR, honoring through learning.

Throughout the week, our energy will be directed toward fostering generative conversations in briefing rooms and at tailgates.

References:

6 Minutes for Safety - 2024 Week of Remembrance

Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center

Updated NWCG Wildland Fire Risk and Complexity Assessment, PMS 236

Date: June 24, 2024
Contact: Incident and Position Standards Committee 

The June 2024 update of the NWCG Wildland Fire Risk and Complexity Assessment, PMS 236, is now available to meet the current needs for incident management typing.

The NWCG Wildland Fire Risk and Complexity Assessment should be used to evaluate firefighter safety issues, assess risk, and identify the appropriate incident management organization based on incident complexity. Assessing risk, determining incident complexity, and identifying an appropriate incident management organization is a subjective process based on examining a combination of indicators or factors, which can change over time.

References:

NWCG Wildland Fire Risk and Complexity Assessment, PMS 236

Operations Branch Director (OPBD) Next Gen PTB Available

Date: June 10, 2024
Contact: NWCG Feedback 

The NWCG Position Task Book for Operations Branch Director (OPBD), PMS 311-109 is now available for use within the OPBD position qualification pathway. As part of the transition to Complex Incident Management (CIM), the OPBD Next Gen PTB was developed and the position qualification pathway updated.

More information about the Next Gen PTB format can be found on the NWCG Position Task Book webpage.

References:

Operations Branch Director Position Page

Operations Branch Director Next Gen PTB

NWCG Position Task Books

Updated NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management, PMS 902

Date: June 5, 2024
Contact: NWCG Incident Business Committee 

The 2024 revision of the NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management, PMS 902 is now available. The uniform application of interagency incident business management standards is critical to interagency fire operations. PMS 902 assists NWCG agencies in constructively working together to provide effective execution of each agency's incident business management program.

References:

PMS 902