Skip to main content

Surface Fire Behavior Nomograms and Nomographs

  1. Instructions for Nomograph Use (Scott 2007)
  2. Instructions for Nomogram Use (Rothermel 1983)

Instructions for Nomograph Use (Scott 2007)

Reference: Scott, Joe H. 2007. Nomographs for estimating surface fire behavior characteristics. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-192. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 119 p

Each fuel model includes a duplicate set of effective windspeed protractor and fire behavior nomograph, one for low windspeeds and one for high windspeeds. Select the one with applicable windspeeds.

Example Nomograph

Image
Example Nomograph. Updated in 2007 to include versions for all 53 models.

Inputs Required:

  1. Fuel Model.
  2. Midflame Windspeed and direction, azimuth clockwise from upslope.
  3. Slope percent.
  4. Dead and Live Fuel Moistures.

Determine Effective Windspeed (EWS) - Low or High

Use the left side nomograph, shown above, if the situation includes cross slope winds.

  1. Plot the slope vector (a) in the upslope direction to the hash representing the slope percent. Interpolate if necessary.
  2. Plot the wind vector (b) using the concentric circle to for the input windspeed and the azimuth above for direction.
  3. Plot parallel vectors (c and d) and resultant vector (e). Read resulting windspeed (e) and direction (f).

Estimate Head Fire Rate of Spread and Flame Length

If the fuel model includes a live fuel component, use the nomograph that references the appropriate live fuel moisture. Otherwise, there is only one nomograph, shown on right.

  1. Using the input dead fuel moisture, draw vertical line (g) to the estimated EWS curve.
  2. Read the flame length from the embedded curves at the intersection (j). Interpolate between lines if necessary.
  3. Draw horizontal line (h) to the left axis and read the Rate of Spread at intersection (i).

Return to Top

Instructions for Nomogram Use (Rothermel 1983)

Reference: Rothermel, Richard C. How to predict the spread and intensity of forest and range fires. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-143. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest, and Range Experiment Station; 1983. 1 61 p. 

Download Nomograms Here 

Unlike the newer nomographs, the original surface fire behavior nomograms have several limitations:

  • These nomograms are only available for the original 13 fuel models.
  • They are intended for use with wind blowing within ±30 degrees of upslope. Use in vectoring is possible, though it is not outlined here.

Inputs Required

  1. Fuel model.
  2. Midflame windspeed.
  3. Percent slope.
  4. Dead fuel moisture (use 1-hr).
  5. Live fuel moisture for fuel models 2, 4, 5, 7, & 10.

Select the Appropriate Windspeed (Low/High) Nomogram

The numbered steps below correspond to the labeled lines on the example nomograms.

Part I: Estimate Effective Windspeed (For All Fuel Models)

  1. In the lower left quadrant, draw a vertical line from percent slope value to intersect midflame windspeed curve. Draw a horizontal line to the left axis and read effective windspeed.
  2. In the lower right quadrant, identify and highlight the appropriate effective windspeed line. Interpolate by adding a line for effective windspeed from step1 above if it is between existing lines.

Part II: Fuel Moisture

For FM 1, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13 with only dead fuel.

  1. In the upper left quadrant of the nomogram, identify and highlight the appropriate dead fuel moisture line based on the input value provided. Interpolate by drawing a new line between existing lines if necessary.

For FM 2, 4, 5, 7, 10 with live fuel.

  • Using the two upper quadrants, locate the appropriate dead fuel moisture value on the two outer vertical axes (highlighted). Connect with a horizontal line.
  • Connect the point where the horizontal line intersects the live fuel curve in the upper left quadrant to the origin point, creating a straight line.
  • Using the input live fuel moisture provided, identify and highlight the appropriate S-curve in the upper right quadrant. Interpolate by adding a new line between existing lines if necessary.

At this point, turning lines have been identified in all 4 quadrants (including the S-curve in the upper right quadrant and the default corner to corner line in the lower left). The nomogram is prepared for Part III.

Part III: Estimating Fire Behavior

With the preparations in parts I and II, turning lines have been highlighted in the lower right quadrant and the upper left quadrant, as well as the appropriate S-curve in the upper right quadrant for fuel models with live fuels.

  • Begin in the upper right quadrant. Draw a horizontal line from dead fuel moisture to the highlighted fuel moisture turning line (s-curve).
  • From the intersection, draw a vertical line down to the turning line in the lower right quadrant (highlighted in step 2).
  1. From the intersection with the turning line in the lower right, draw a horizontal line to the turning line in the lower left quadrant.
  2. From the intersection with the turning line in the lower left quadrant, draw a vertical line up to the turning line in the upper left quadrant (highlighted in step 3).
  3. From the intersection with the turning line in the upper left quadrant, draw a horizontal line to the right until it intersects the vertical line drawn in step 4.

Part IV: Reading Fire Behavior Outputs

Read Heat Per Unit Area where the vertical line from step 2 intersects its axis in the upper right quadrant.

  • In the first example (Dead Fuel Only), the Heat Per Unit Area is estimated at approximately 750 BTU/sq. ft.
  • In the second example (Dead & Live Fuels), the Heat Per Unit Area is estimated at approximately 215 BTU/sq. ft.

Read Rate of Spread where the horizontal line from step 5 intersects its axis in the upper right quadrant.

  • In the first example (Dead Fuel Only), the Rate of Spread is estimated at approximately 7 chains per hour.
  • In the second example (Dead & Live Fuels), the Rate of Spread is also estimated at approximately 7 chains per hour.

Read Flame Length and Fireline Intensity at the final intersection produced in step 5.

  • In the first example (Dead Fuel Only), the intersection between lines 4 and 7 comes between the Flame Length/Fireline Intensity contour lines 3/60 and 4/100. It could be estimated as 4 ft or 90 BTU/ft/sec.
  • In the second example (Dead & Live Fuels), the intersection between lines 4 and 7 comes between the Flame Length/Fireline Intensity contour lines 2/25 and 3/60. It could be estimated as 2 ft or 30 BTU/ft/sec.

Example Nomogram for Dead Fuel Only (Fuel Models 1, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13)

Image
Example Surface Fire Behavior Nomogram for fuel models with dead fuels only.

Example Nomogram Using Dead & Live Fuels (Fuel Models 2, 4, 5, 7, 100)

Image
Example Surface Fire Behavior Nomogram for fuel models with both live and dead fuels.

NWCG Latest Announcements

2024 Week of Remembrance

Date: June 27, 2024
Contact: 6 Minutes for Safety Subcommittee 

As we approach the 2024 Week of Remembrance (WOR), June 30 to July 6, we dedicate this time to thoughtfully reviewing and recognizing the events of the 2018 Mendocino Complex. As such, this year’s theme of “Learning From the Mendocino Complex” embodies a longstanding hallmark of WOR, honoring through learning.

Throughout the week, our energy will be directed toward fostering generative conversations in briefing rooms and at tailgates.

References:

6 Minutes for Safety - 2024 Week of Remembrance

Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center

Updated NWCG Wildland Fire Risk and Complexity Assessment, PMS 236

Date: June 24, 2024
Contact: Incident and Position Standards Committee 

The June 2024 update of the NWCG Wildland Fire Risk and Complexity Assessment, PMS 236, is now available to meet the current needs for incident management typing.

The NWCG Wildland Fire Risk and Complexity Assessment should be used to evaluate firefighter safety issues, assess risk, and identify the appropriate incident management organization based on incident complexity. Assessing risk, determining incident complexity, and identifying an appropriate incident management organization is a subjective process based on examining a combination of indicators or factors, which can change over time.

References:

NWCG Wildland Fire Risk and Complexity Assessment, PMS 236

Operations Branch Director (OPBD) Next Gen PTB Available

Date: June 10, 2024
Contact: NWCG Feedback 

The NWCG Position Task Book for Operations Branch Director (OPBD), PMS 311-109 is now available for use within the OPBD position qualification pathway. As part of the transition to Complex Incident Management (CIM), the OPBD Next Gen PTB was developed and the position qualification pathway updated.

More information about the Next Gen PTB format can be found on the NWCG Position Task Book webpage.

References:

Operations Branch Director Position Page

Operations Branch Director Next Gen PTB

NWCG Position Task Books

Updated NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management, PMS 902

Date: June 5, 2024
Contact: NWCG Incident Business Committee 

The 2024 revision of the NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management, PMS 902 is now available. The uniform application of interagency incident business management standards is critical to interagency fire operations. PMS 902 assists NWCG agencies in constructively working together to provide effective execution of each agency's incident business management program.

References:

PMS 902